Monthly Archives: April 2017

Chrysler K-Car Club President Goes On Racist, Homophobic Rant

[Originally found on the Malaise Motors group on Facebook.]

I’m passionate about cars in an irrational and unreasonable way. The best automobile I ever owned was a Saab 900 that cost a small fortune to maintain over the course of five years which I finally gave away to a friend and collector. There was nothing sensible about the entire experience.

Passion, by its very nature, precludes rationality. Channeled productively, it can motivate greatness and achievement. Unfortunately, channeling your energy into disposable Mopars from the 1980s can lead to, at least in Guy Coulombe’s case, racism and religious zealotry. I can be absurdly religious about my favorite cars and trucks, but not at the expense of human decency.


Fast Tube by Casper

FB_IMG_1492931587631-2017-04-23-23-59.jpg

This is an email that Mr Coulombe sent to members of the Chrysler K Car Club:

FB_IMG_1492931591034-2017-04-23-23-59.jpg

For clarification, the Chrysler E-class was a stretched K-car. He is not referring to a Mercedes-Benz.

He then denies being racist:

FB_IMG_1492931595678-2017-04-23-23-59.jpg

Then he apologizes for being racist while being racist:

FB_IMG_1492931598890-2017-04-23-23-59.jpg

And then he gets upset with “FOUR homosexuals”:

FB_IMG_1492931602267-2017-04-23-23-59.jpg

Cars are the original social network. You drive them to new places to meet new folks, bond over design and performance, and form lifelong friendships with great people who share your values.

Or in the case of Guy V. Coulombe, you use them as a platform to be an asshole.

BONUS: He has a wildly unsuccessful GoFundMe campaign seeking donations to restore his 1984 LeBaron. He genuinely doesn’t understand why people aren’t contributing to the cause.

The Buffonery of Badging

Badges are like Tinder profiles. They can say anything, most of it a load of bull, to impress people who probably don’t care.

In the old days, 1980-2000 in my case, before forced induction was the norm, displacement was a point of pride and prestige. The Infiniti “Q45” had a 4.5L V8, the Lexus “LS400” had a 4.0L V8, the BMW “525i” had a 2.5L I6, and Acura went as far as foolishly dropping “Legend” in favor of “3.5 RL.” — I suspect RL stands for Regressive Legend.

And then there were cams and valves. Higher-output Saturns had “TWIN CAM” printed on doors and trunk lids while Cadillacs boasted “32v Northstar,” the branding for GM’s 300hp 4.6L DOHC V8.


You can’t handle these valves.

The more “stuff” your engine had, the higher the output, the more you likely paid for your car. If you yearn for a higher rung on the social ladder, slap some plastichrome numbers to the trunk lid and COMMENCE PEACOCKING (say it aloud in a boisterous tone as you pound your chest while staring menacingly at your coworkers).

For my father’s generation, displacement was expressed in cubic inches: 327, 440, 500, etc. Downsizing brought on by the oil embargo and emissions regulations, unfortunately, brought average displacements closer to 200ci. To distract the public from a seemingly dystopian low-output future, the industry switched to metric, the equivalent of doing 120 on the highway… in kilometers.

But recently, displacement ceased to matter. Rising fuel economy standards and crude oil at over $100/bbl pushed the industry toward forced induction, formerly the exclusive domain of diesel trucks and performance cars. The Ford Fiesta Ecoboost, boasting a 1.0L 3-cylinder turbo capable of 148 lb-ft of torque, gained a reputation as miniature marvel of efficiency.

In case you’re wondering how a turbocharger produces power, take a snail with a spinny compressor thing inside of it, force feed it some hot air, and unicorns gallop out the other side. Contrary to the muscle car mantra, it is a replacement for displacement.

For marketing purposes, this poses a problem. If 4.6 and 5.0 and 6.2 and 7.0 liters are numbers worth bragging about, what happens as turbo and supercharging lend prestige and power to small displacements like 2.0L and 3.0L?

Does badging then become a meaningless waste of chrome? BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Infiniti have abandoned displacement-based model numbers in favor of “whatever the hell we want to call it” with no connection to engine size whatsoever, but large, shiny badges on trunk lids and fenders bafflingly remain.

Cadillac’s 2.0L turbo produces more grunt at lower revs than the naturally aspirated 3.6L V6. The twin-turbo 3.0L V6 in the full size CT6 produces over 400hp, an impressive number that would have been worthy of “V,” “M,” or “AMG” branding just ten years earlier. Infiniti’s new Q50, following decades of logic, should have a 5.0L V8. Instead, its twin-turbo V6 powerplant produces 400hp from 3.0L.

Forced induction comes with its own badging too, often with a “T” at the end denoting a turbocharger or an “S” for supercharging. Mercedes-Benz went full schnitzel by slapping an impossible to miss “K O M P R E S S O R” badge across the rear decklid.

Not just a turbo. It’s a KOMPRESSOR!!!!!!

And electrification complicates the situation further, with Tesla opting for model names that align with battery capacity.

To demonstrate this phenomenon in marketing terms, here’s an example of how the male mind operates in response to vehicle badging:

Bigger numbers >

More powerful engine >

Paid more for the car (or spent time building it) >

Because you have more money >

Because you worked and studied hard >

Because you’re smarter than everyone else >

Because you’re a superior human being >

Therefore, girls want to touch your junk.

Manufacturers know damn well that men are idiots and screw with our lizard brains accordingly.

It seems fair to conclude that no one in 2017 cares about displacement or the chrome badges that identify it. Perhaps Saab, with its decades of turbo development, was decades ahead of its time. Or maybe cars of the future will be identical self-driven electric pods, relegating social status to the domain of jewelry and clothing. We are, after all, a basic species — the moment we commoditize and democratize a technology, we find new ways to divide ourselves into tiers.

In the end, our lives boil down to shallow attempts at finding meaning through short, trite, and wasteful behaviors, so feel free to pluck the badges off your car. Of course, as the guy in a base model BMW with a meager 230hp, that’s exactly what you’d expect me to say.

Convertibles: Magically Terrible

I was obsessed with the Miata back in the 90s, spending my lunch breaks in the high school computer lab perusing Miata.net, fantasizing over what it would be like to carve through mountain roads with a full, wide view of the road and sky.

Really, that’s what owning and driving a convertible boils down to: fantasy.

Knife-wielding vandals and hail storms threaten to pierce the top while structural wobbles can shake the body like a jello mold in a California quake. It’s less thrilling than a motorcycle without the comfort and security benefits of a fixed metal roof.

And that’s just fine.

I’ve learned to deal with a certain level of risk. With my Miata, Saab 900, and E46 BMW 3-series, all equipped with fabric tops, I never bothered locking the car. If someone wanted in, I’d prefer they opened the door and looked around rather than taking a blade to my $1500 roof. On nice days at work I park with the top wide open. There’s a free-wheeling action film indulgence about hopping into a readily open car and taking off.

My old Saab quivered and shook the way my dog does when he hears thunder, and the firmer suspension on the turbo 900 only exaggerated the problem. For a convertible to feel as rigid and stiff as its fixed-roof counterpart, engineers have to reinforce the floors, sides, and A-pillar with metal bracing.

Added weight then detracts from the feeling of lightness and sensation of performance. With the exception of small roadsters like the Boxster and Miata, most topless cars are relegated to boulevard cruiser status, emphasizing style over performance. And again, that’s just fine.

My E93 BMW 3-series cabriolet, at over 4000lbs before adding my fat ass and a tank of premium, rests on the pavement like a brick at the bottom of a swimming pool. It behaves similarly to my equally hefty Cadillac Seville, gliding over bumps with a muted thud as the crust of the earth writhes in agony. It’s sporty looking, yes, but in practice it’s a cruise ship in a cycling suit.

And then there’s the safety issue. Without roll hoops (pop-up or fixed) combined with a reinforced A-pillar, your skull is a water balloon in a rollover. Without a roof and B-pillar to reinforce the sides, the burden is placed entirely on door beams to provide protection.

As for scenery, metro Detroit offers a plethora of exotic sights, sounds, and experiences including burned down buildings, dank weed, carjackings, unburnt hydrocarbons (cars missing their catalysts), and flicked cigarette butts bouncing down I-75. Opening the top amplifies all of it. With the exception of scenic Grosse Pointe along Lakeshore Drive, you have to leave town to enjoy Michigan’s aesthetically pleasing lakes, forests, cliffs, beaches, and sand dunes.

I claim to be a reasonable person who makes choices based on facts and unquestionably, these negatives vastly outweigh the positives. But emotion, the reason I love cars, isn’t quantifiable.

The notion of freedom, the daring confidence of exposure, and the longer, lower styling make up for all of it. Topless motoring may be the antithesis of pure performance but it is itself a form of pure joy. I’d have it no other way.